Sunday, 2 March 2014
Objectification or Art?
Two woman in their undies! What does that evoke to you? Classic over edited model bodies that are air brushed to look complete perfect? Sexual objectification? Porn? Attention seekers? As a society we are so over sexualised that the minute we see the naked or nearly naked human form we just naturally objectify the model. Whether that's the intention of the image or not. Now I'm just like the rest of us, there are ten thousand things that I hate about my body. Like most of us weight is something I consider constantly. I eat healthily and I exercise. Not so much because its fun but because it's a necessity. It took A LOT of persuading for me do this shot. It's a still taken from a music video we are making for the musician Noir. The shots serve the narrative, and as actress being scantily clad is something you have to get use too. However thinking about it I realised what I wanted to publish this image out of the context of the video. Clearly Noir (the other model in the photo) is a slim girl, and at first I didn't want to stand next to her as I thought she would make me look bigger?! How silly is that?! I'm proud that I'm stood here looking strong and confident because we are all so conditioned all the time to think our bodies are not good enough. And I may not be a twig but my body is strong and healthy and it lets me experience life. So you're telling me that I should feel bad about myself because I'm not a size eight, big breasted perfection of female form? Bullshit! We should all be proud of our bodies whatever size or shape we are, because as long as they're functioning well, we are all bloody lucky. Plus aren't they nice to look at?!
Wednesday, 5 February 2014
Batman, Wolverine and Robocop, or why Darren Aronofsky should make a blockbuster
As you are probably aware, Jose Padhila's Robocop reboot of
Robocop opens in the UK on Friday, and I for one can barely
contain my apathy. It's important to point out that I haven't seen
the film yet, and early reviews have been surprisingly positive, so
perhaps I'm being overly harsh.
The point is, though, that there was a time that I was genuinely
excited about this movie - about four years ago when it was first in
pre-production. The reason I lost my excitement had little to do with
the Batman-wearing-a-cycle-helmet redesign, and more to do with the
change of director. Robocop 2014 was originally going to be
shot by Darren Aronofsky, the visionary film maker behind Black
Swan and Requiem For A Dream.
Aronofsky seemed the perfect choice. Ever since his debut, Pi,
his films have had an unsettling element of body horror (think of the
pounding migraines of Pi's lead character, or the close ups of
the protagonists abused and twisted bodies in The Wrestler or
Black Swan). The thought of what Aronofsky could do with a
half-man, half machine (all cop) protagonist was trouser-tentingly
exciting. Clearly, however, Aronofsky's ideas were too terrifying
(and presumably too R-rated) for Hollywood executives, who passed on
his vision in favour of a relative unknown.
This isn't the first time Aronofsky has developed a tentpole movie,
only to fail to see it through to the end. A couple of years ago he
was involved in development on The Wolverine. Hugh Jackman
reported they wanted to do a stand alone, R-rated Wolverine movie set
in Vietnam in the '70s. Once again, the idea of what Aronofsky could
do with an immortal character in an R-rated film is impossibly
tempting. Fast forward to 2013 and The Wolverine is a fairly
generic 12A superhero movie set in modern day Japan.
Finally, the best known unmade Aronofsky movie must be Batman:
Year One – the film which eventually became Batman Begins.
Although the original comic book doesn't exactly lend itself to
body horror there are plenty of Batman villains I would love to see
Aronofsky take a crack at (Two Face, Killer Croc, and Bane to name
just three).
Perhaps Aronofsky's true place is at the fringes of the mainstream. As a director he arguably has the best and most exciting oeuvre of the twentieth century, and if he had been distracted by these blockbuster movies we might never have had classics like Black Swan and The Wrestler. It's also entirely possible that, had he stuck at them, his versions of
Batman, Wolverine and Robocop would have been turgid,
generic, compromised mush, ruined by studio meddling and bereft of any of the style and
intelligence that he has brought to the films that he has made.
By
God, though, I would like to have seen what he could have done with these iconic characters. Please, someone, give this man a blockbuster.
Saturday, 25 January 2014
What happens in the kitchen stays in the kitchen.
Oh the joys of shared living?! I mean when you live in a shambolic excuse for a house ( the fact that I'm calling it a house is miss selling it, it's more of a squat I pay rent for) Anyway i share with six other people meaning there have got to be some random conversations and happenings that occur while just eating dinner alone. Casually eating my falafels and salad the other evening.... " no we threw away those syringes" yum. (I think she wanted them for some photography based project) I endured a debate about beat poetry, another concerning are nerves pushed or pulled? And finally a impromptu performance of my housemates latest play in which he is talking to his hand. Surprisingly good. Anyway this got me thinking about the luxury of our own home and the acts that we indulge in when we know the general public can't sneak a peak. Whether that's me eating my dinner accompanied by a disgusting amount of grated cheese, my housemate drinking so much that he gave us a gorgeous fifteen minute rendition of Meatloaf's A Bat Out Of Hell, or just wearing a unicorn onsie with a considerable amount of coffee split down the front. These are not activities that would be allowed outsides the safety of those four shabby walls. However I wouldn't change it, people are much more interesting when they think no one is watching.
Labels:
acting,
falafel,
Kitchen,
meatloaf,
photography,
renting,
shared living
Wednesday, 22 January 2014
New Hollywood, Old Directors
As you are no doubt aware, Martin Scorsese's latest film, The Wolf
of Wall Street, opened in the UK on Friday. Reviews have been
largely positive. Empire magazine even stated it “is the first
Martin Scorsese film in some time that feels as though, in a few
years, it will join Taxi Driver, Raging Bull and
Goodfellas in the canon.”
At the end of the last century the crown kings of American film were
the directors of the “New Hollywood”. This was the term given to
the gang of young directors who rose to prominence in the late 1960s
and early 70s. Martin Scorsese, Francis Ford Coppola, Steven
Spielberg, George Lucas, William Friedkin et al. Martin Scorsese was
still back then referred to as “America's greatest living film
maker”. It's a label that is less used these days, partly because
there are new pretenders to the crown (for example David Fincher and
PT Anderson), but also because nothing Scorsese has done since 1990
has reached the dizzy heights of his early masterpieces.
Many of his contemporaries have fared much worse. The same issue of
Empire quoted above also features Francis Ford Coppola's latest movie
Twixt – which has gone straight to DVD in the UK after two
years in limbo. It's a rarity these days for a film by Brian De Palma
to not go straight to DVD. William Friedkin spent nearly 20
years languishing in the world of TV. Spielberg's obviously doing
well for himself, but most of his recent work is still a long way
from the glory days of Jaws and ET.
This is not a phenomenon exclusive to film. How many musicians,
writers and artists blaze a trail in their early careers before
sliding slowly into mediocrity?
I believe that most human beings really only have a few profound
observations they can make about life and the world. Once they've
made those initial statements, where do they go? They can either
repeat those same few statements over and over, with inevitably
diminishing returns, they can quit and do something else, or they can
work for hire, which might make you money but is unlikely to lead to
too many awards ceremonies.
There is, however, an exception to the rule that artists usually do
their best work early in their careers. The great American directors
of the 70s are now in their 70s. They are in the final
phase of their working lives, which gives them a new perspective, and
perhaps a new artistic impetus. As
stated above, The Wolf of Wall Street
has been getting strong reviews. William Friedkin's Killer
Joe was warmly received in 2011. Terence Malick has made more
films in the past four years then he made in the previous forty.
Spielberg's Lincoln is widely regarded as his best film since
at least Schindler's List.
I think we're beginning to see a resurgence of some of the greatest
film makers who have ever lived. And I can't wait to see what they do
next.
Thursday, 16 January 2014
There is nothing worse than cold tea.
Seriously, there IS nothing worse than cold tea, and with the perpetual cold it is inevitable. Sorry it's January, the month of no money, crap weather and a serious lack of inspiration as everyone's cogs start to slowly whir back round into action just in time for spring. So this makes me think, what do I want from this year? Vague plans are always helpful, when I say vague plans I mean wondering mindlessly around desperately clutching a diary full of lists, plus a ton of incoherent thoughts scribbled on my hands, which of course make no sense the instant the pen separates itself from my skin.
So I have decided to draw some ideas from places I wouldn't normally look. And push myself to try out some creative mediums that I would not touch, for fear of them being stupid insulting attempts at other peoples precious art forms! I'm talking drawing, manual photography, using new software. Don't worry no human eyes will ever be able to scan this work, it's far to naive to unleash on the world!
However these new mediums has made me look for excitement and inspiration in different places and I've got back into magazine culture once more. For years I have been disillusioned with the vile mass produced mags, which cover nothing of interest if you have more than two brain cells however here are my three latest favourites...
- Boon magazine, a Brighton local, covers local culture without being wanky, the coolest article being one on The Brighton Photocopy club, a fanzine society.
- Oh Comely, a über cute if a little whimsical. A magazine whose latest edition is themed around space!
- Frankie Magazine has the coolest photography, latest edition had mega sweet illustrations there for your colouring in pleasure.
You know I'm not even going to put their web addresses here, because nothing beats the smell and the feel of a magazine in your hands.
So there we are, grasping at inspirational straws. Roll on February. Must be bad if we long for February.
Thursday, 2 January 2014
Why does it have to be New Year to make a resolution?
So as I sit and type this off my phone, my laptop has decided to have a funny turn, annoying as i have been saying for ages that I will get it fixed. I was thinking that New Years is always used as a excuse to do the things you have been meaning to do your entire life, lose weight, go after your dream job, start a new hobby. So I sit here in my damp smelling floral sweatshirt and I think to myself, I make new resolutions on a nearly daily basis. The wonderful friends that I spent New Years with all stated that they were not going to make any resoloutions when I asked them. Like it was a crime against coolness to want to improve yourself and your life. But what they meant was why bother on this particular evening? Come January the 1st half the population were swearing off booze and eating salad. You can do that any time. Like fabulous mothers and grandmas always say. There is no time like the present. So whether you made any New Year's plans this year or not, you do not need a excuse. Whatever you want to do, go do it. I'm off to fix my laptop, I think I will always smell of damp though, I like old houses too much.
Wednesday, 11 December 2013
How Artists Sell Their Work
For a
creative person one of the most difficult things is to monetise your
work. Firstly there is an inherent practical difficulty involved in
actually finding people who will pay you enough to do the thing that
you love that you can make a living doing it. Beyond that, there is
an inherent conflict between art and commerce.
Pretty
much everyone would much rather be an author or a sculptor or a film
maker than they would work in a call centre taking abuse from people
much stupider than them. Unfortunately, there are very simple
financial realities that mean most of us are very unlikely to achieve
that dream. If even 1% of us were published authors there would not
be anywhere near enough readers in the world to make the number of
books published commercially viable.
The
dream of becoming a financially successful artist – in any field -
is made even harder to achieve if you aren’t willing to compromise
your vision – at least to a certain extent – in the interests of
commerciality. This isn’t necessarily a bad thing. It’s very easy
for people to fall in love with their work and become blind to its
flaws. What a writer or artist might think of as a commercial
compromise may often, in fact, be a straightforward improvement to
their work. A good example is True Romance, which originally ended in
Quentin Tarantino's script with the death of Clarence, Christian
Slater’s character; this would have been a needlessly downbeat
ending to a pretty light and upbeat sunny film.
Similarly,
someone may produce truly great work whilst working for somebody
else. Don’t forget Michelangelo painted the Sistine Chapel under
commission.
However
there comes a point when commerce gets in the way of art. Where
lowest common denominator considerations edge out any inch of nuance
or depth to a piece of art. There was a time when we used to blame
American teenagers for the dumbing down of film. Now the foreign
market is considered the biggest culprit. Everything has to be easily
translated and culturally understandable to audiences all around the
world. Established properties are considered preferable to new
intellectual properties, as they are a known quantity and easier to
market. There have been 7 X-Men films in fifteen years? No matter,
let’s make some more!
Then
finally, comes the snapping point. What if you’re working for
idiots? People whose every artistic instinct is wrong? People have no
clue what they’re doing but who hold the purse strings and can
therefore force you to dance to their tune? Many people, for the sake
of politeness, or through a misguided belief that they can overcome
these problems and remain true to their artistic vision, plough on
under such circumstances for far too long.
It’s
understandable. So many of us have dreams of being an artist that we
will suffer almost endless indignities in pursuit of our dreams.
However, for the sake of the work, and for your own pride, there
comes a time when you have to say “Fuck it!”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
